Samarpan is the word which they use and pls understand that. I think the complete talk is on the basis of assumptions though truth is there in this but the core issue is that when as a common swadhyayee who is following dadaji there is no question of money come in long ways apart from that the policy of money which dadaji accepeted in his parivar is totally diffrent i dont want to describe it here because the person who is writing this is wel aware of that and i would say maore aware of that but the question is when ur not even asked to give and yet u give and then again they keep condition that u only give if u feel you are giving it without asking about the use of that money then after that why u look for that. What's your suggestion for clean up, Stoneice02? I'll let someone who actually knows something about the subject merge it properly into the article. I've copied the 'Swadhyay' section from Pandurang Shastri Athavale here, since it's much more relevant to this article. Will some please clean it up? Stoneice02 04:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Just found this article with the random article button. Go to to find link to many news article as well as discussion representing both sides of the issue. It was deleted because it was not an accurate definition of the work done by Parum Pujya Pandurang Shashraji Athavale. Nevertheless, we are all brothers and sisters underneath the fatherhood of God, and please do not be offended by having it deleted. If one had to define what the Swadhyaya work is, it can not be defined with that paragraph. Note: The reason why that paragraph was deleted from the main section was because Swadhyaya is a symbol of decades worth of work. Anyone with more information, please jump in. Although I have only a slight knowledge of the philosophy, I have at least got the article started. Okay, this page had a "context" tag and a single sentence that didn't seem to impart much information. In recent articles, the the Swadhyaya Pariwar have come under scrutiny of the indian government for the alleged murder of someone who exposed their questionable distribution of funds, I don't understand why the following was deleted instead of being edited. 16 External links modified (January 2018).4 What's your suggestion for clean up, Stoneice02?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |